<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hit Exchanges And Google AdSense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/</link>
	<description>Giving you your daily blog fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:34:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the opinions.  I expect the word is getting about of the clash between AdSense and the Hit Exchanges.  Blog Soldiers were no doubt trying to protect themselves from losing active members.  However I feel that their email shows a lack of care to their members by giving out information that is purely in their own interests.
Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the opinions.  I expect the word is getting about of the clash between AdSense and the Hit Exchanges.  Blog Soldiers were no doubt trying to protect themselves from losing active members.  However I feel that their email shows a lack of care to their members by giving out information that is purely in their own interests.<br />
Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>good luck with the advertising, we sure could use some websites to advertise for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good luck with the advertising, we sure could use some websites to advertise for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cctech</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>cctech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I contacted Google and asked for clarification because we got the same &quot;we are detecting hits from certain sites BLAH, BLAH, BLAH&quot; email.  Of course, they we less than thorough in their explanation and referred me to the TOS.  Anyway, to make a long story longer, after several back-and-forth emails with them, blogexplosion, blogmad, etc. are no-nos, although Google did not come out and specifically mention them by name - they fit into the violating &quot;category&quot;.

So, we stopped using those traffic exchanges, removed Adsense from the home page (its not like I was going to retire from those MASSIVE checks anyway) and started concentrating on renting space with text-link-ads and AdVolcano.  We&#039;ll see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contacted Google and asked for clarification because we got the same &#8220;we are detecting hits from certain sites BLAH, BLAH, BLAH&#8221; email.  Of course, they we less than thorough in their explanation and referred me to the TOS.  Anyway, to make a long story longer, after several back-and-forth emails with them, blogexplosion, blogmad, etc. are no-nos, although Google did not come out and specifically mention them by name &#8211; they fit into the violating &#8220;category&#8221;.</p>
<p>So, we stopped using those traffic exchanges, removed Adsense from the home page (its not like I was going to retire from those MASSIVE checks anyway) and started concentrating on renting space with text-link-ads and AdVolcano.  We&#8217;ll see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/01/31/hit-exchanges-and-google-adsense/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>i received that same email and began to question what they were stating

i went in search of my own answer and had hopes to find some way to contact google but came up short

i found the submission form it just wouldnt go through</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i received that same email and began to question what they were stating</p>
<p>i went in search of my own answer and had hopes to find some way to contact google but came up short</p>
<p>i found the submission form it just wouldnt go through</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

