<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to extract every outbound link from your blog.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Giving you your daily blog fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:55:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up. I am happy to stand corrected too. 

How I understood it after going blind reading all the theories, was that a page has a rank/ value and somehow, fractions of that rank get attributed to the outbound links on the page, affecting the original page&#039;s rank. 

Actually, the more I read it, the more it sounds like a completely hooey theory!!! Probably some Zen webmaster decided that if there is a net positive to incoming links there must be a net negative somewhere else in the equation.

I will quit while Im not too far behind and go add some more comments to that huge list of links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up. I am happy to stand corrected too. </p>
<p>How I understood it after going blind reading all the theories, was that a page has a rank/ value and somehow, fractions of that rank get attributed to the outbound links on the page, affecting the original page&#8217;s rank. </p>
<p>Actually, the more I read it, the more it sounds like a completely hooey theory!!! Probably some Zen webmaster decided that if there is a net positive to incoming links there must be a net negative somewhere else in the equation.</p>
<p>I will quit while Im not too far behind and go add some more comments to that huge list of links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/02/22/how-to-extract-every-outbound-link-from-your-blog/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I stand to be corrected, but I thought this page rank dilution thing was a fallacy? Otherwise, no-one&#039;s ever going to gain any links are they?

I know links are weighted according to &#039;authority&#039;, but I didn&#039;t think you could harm your own ranking by linking to a new blog with 0 PR. Seems a bit spiteful if that&#039;s the case...

I do agree with not linking to sites known for &#039;black hat&#039; SEO or who have been excluded from Google&#039;s index though-that could cause you some harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand to be corrected, but I thought this page rank dilution thing was a fallacy? Otherwise, no-one&#8217;s ever going to gain any links are they?</p>
<p>I know links are weighted according to &#8216;authority&#8217;, but I didn&#8217;t think you could harm your own ranking by linking to a new blog with 0 PR. Seems a bit spiteful if that&#8217;s the case&#8230;</p>
<p>I do agree with not linking to sites known for &#8216;black hat&#8217; SEO or who have been excluded from Google&#8217;s index though-that could cause you some harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
