<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Smarter With Spam: A Report Proves It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/</link>
	<description>Giving you your daily blog fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:34:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dandellion</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>dandellion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>yes, it is automated and easy. but bandwidth costs. does it really payout?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it is automated and easy. but bandwidth costs. does it really payout?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3712</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3712</guid>
		<description>@dandellion: I agree with you 100 percent. But as Matt points out, it&#039;s irrelevant due to the ease and large quantity the spammer has available. Bugs me still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dandellion: I agree with you 100 percent. But as Matt points out, it&#8217;s irrelevant due to the ease and large quantity the spammer has available. Bugs me still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3701</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3701</guid>
		<description>it doesnt really matter.

spam first is now easier than ever, there are programs they can just insert their info, find email addresses press a button and WAM!

spam cost= 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it doesnt really matter.</p>
<p>spam first is now easier than ever, there are programs they can just insert their info, find email addresses press a button and WAM!</p>
<p>spam cost= 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dandellion</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>dandellion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>This may sound naive, but I never figured how spamming pays up. I mean, every spam mail has to pass the filters (both on server then on client), then to be noticed by user and interesting enough to  make it click on the link, then there have to be something on the web site for user to make an action. How many spam mails make their trip to the final destination and actually make some money to the spammers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may sound naive, but I never figured how spamming pays up. I mean, every spam mail has to pass the filters (both on server then on client), then to be noticed by user and interesting enough to  make it click on the link, then there have to be something on the web site for user to make an action. How many spam mails make their trip to the final destination and actually make some money to the spammers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>me again:) Hate to bother you, but just wanted to bring it to your attention...when you were visiting, if you had to scroll waaaaay down to find the entries, I fixed it.  It looked fine on the laptop at home, and my morning job computer.  But, saw that it was messed up on the computer I use in the afternoon (I work on 4 different computers most every day;)  So, if you saw sidebar and no entries... :)   its fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me again:) Hate to bother you, but just wanted to bring it to your attention&#8230;when you were visiting, if you had to scroll waaaaay down to find the entries, I fixed it.  It looked fine on the laptop at home, and my morning job computer.  But, saw that it was messed up on the computer I use in the afternoon (I work on 4 different computers most every day;)  So, if you saw sidebar and no entries&#8230; <img src='http://blogaboutyourblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    its fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2007/06/04/youre-smarter-with-spam-a-report-proves-it/#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by! :)
Yes -- long side bar (and I&#039;ve tried to use condensing scripts where I could -- I have lots of &quot;favorite&quot; sites I like to visit or promote ... including yours.(yes, whether I get the opp or not).  I this is a great blog, and I want to visit often.  I&#039;ve only read a couple articles so far, but will be reading more later today after work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by! <img src='http://blogaboutyourblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Yes &#8212; long side bar (and I&#8217;ve tried to use condensing scripts where I could &#8212; I have lots of &#8220;favorite&#8221; sites I like to visit or promote &#8230; including yours.(yes, whether I get the opp or not).  I this is a great blog, and I want to visit often.  I&#8217;ve only read a couple articles so far, but will be reading more later today after work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

