<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Mixx Be the Next Digg?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/</link>
	<description>Giving you your daily blog fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:55:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social bookmarking for social media. &#187; Walker Media</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-71324</link>
		<dc:creator>Social bookmarking for social media. &#187; Walker Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-71324</guid>
		<description>[...] any of the snobbery that occurs on Digg. It also comes highly recommended by bloggers like Sarah, Matthew and Corvida. I signed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any of the snobbery that occurs on Digg. It also comes highly recommended by bloggers like Sarah, Matthew and Corvida. I signed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malte Landwehr</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-37181</link>
		<dc:creator>Malte Landwehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-37181</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Mixx already outperforms Digg in every regard (apart from user base). But unfortunately from a marketer&#039;s perspective the amount of users a network is able to drive is the most important one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Mixx already outperforms Digg in every regard (apart from user base). But unfortunately from a marketer&#8217;s perspective the amount of users a network is able to drive is the most important one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????? (Jason)</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36815</link>
		<dc:creator>????? (Jason)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36815</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... this could certainly be a great place, depending on the type of readers and contributors it garners over the next year or so.

Thanks for telling us about it! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; this could certainly be a great place, depending on the type of readers and contributors it garners over the next year or so.</p>
<p>Thanks for telling us about it! <img src='http://blogaboutyourblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestre</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36588</link>
		<dc:creator>bestre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36588</guid>
		<description>interesting...I&#039;ll drop by at this site...Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting&#8230;I&#8217;ll drop by at this site&#8230;Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Edell</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36420</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Edell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36420</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. I don&#039;t think the unrestricted DIGG bashing is a particularly spiffy idea if they want to keep a scum-free site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. I don&#8217;t think the unrestricted DIGG bashing is a particularly spiffy idea if they want to keep a scum-free site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36399</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36399</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your personal take on Mixx. I recently became active (again) with Digg, but I must say that the results thus far are disappointing. Quality stuff gets shoved to the side while some of the worst junk seems to get Dugg. I will check out Mixx in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your personal take on Mixx. I recently became active (again) with Digg, but I must say that the results thus far are disappointing. Quality stuff gets shoved to the side while some of the worst junk seems to get Dugg. I will check out Mixx in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment Friday for April 18th &#124; Blog About Your Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36345</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment Friday for April 18th &#124; Blog About Your Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36345</guid>
		<description>[...] week our Mixx article definitely took of which I was kind of surprised about. We are also just getting ready for Vegas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week our Mixx article definitely took of which I was kind of surprised about. We are also just getting ready for Vegas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Chef</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36172</guid>
		<description>The &quot;group feature.&quot; link is broken. Btw. feel free to apply for membership in our SEO 2.0 group. Mixx will overcome Digg sooner or later. Sooner if Newscorp or Microsoft buy Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;group feature.&#8221; link is broken. Btw. feel free to apply for membership in our SEO 2.0 group. Mixx will overcome Digg sooner or later. Sooner if Newscorp or Microsoft buy Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Csutoras</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36164</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Csutoras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36164</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mixx maintains a unique karma reputation system, there’s not a famous service that uses a similar system to that of Mixx.&quot;

Umm I think you forgot reddit gives karma for voting... :( 

All in all a decent article and fully explains Mixx. I think comparing it to Digg is laughable at best since even sites like Propeller and Reddit get less than 25% the traffic, users, or recognition that Digg gets. 

I would be willing to bet Mixx is barely scratching maybe 5% on any stat in comparison to Digg. 

Good post though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mixx maintains a unique karma reputation system, there’s not a famous service that uses a similar system to that of Mixx.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm I think you forgot reddit gives karma for voting&#8230; <img src='http://blogaboutyourblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>All in all a decent article and fully explains Mixx. I think comparing it to Digg is laughable at best since even sites like Propeller and Reddit get less than 25% the traffic, users, or recognition that Digg gets. </p>
<p>I would be willing to bet Mixx is barely scratching maybe 5% on any stat in comparison to Digg. </p>
<p>Good post though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla @ WordPlay</title>
		<link>http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-36135</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla @ WordPlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogaboutyourblog.com/2008/04/15/could-mixx-be-the-next-digg/#comment-36135</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this well-written article. 

I just joined Mixx last weekend and found it refreshing. Not only are the people nice, but the design is clean and easy to use. So far, I&#039;m impressed. Your article helped me understand a little more about it so I can use it more effectively. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this well-written article. </p>
<p>I just joined Mixx last weekend and found it refreshing. Not only are the people nice, but the design is clean and easy to use. So far, I&#8217;m impressed. Your article helped me understand a little more about it so I can use it more effectively. <img src='http://blogaboutyourblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
